Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 431
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff: Andrew Mauder
Defendant: CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Nicholas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff: Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant: Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. MROZINSKI
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff: GLADYS M ORTIZ
Defendant: JEFFREY MROZINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff: RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant: LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff: STEVEN MORGAN
Defendant: OFFICER ALEJANDRO ORTIZ, CORPORAL JARED DAVIS and COATESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant: CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BROWN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2023cv04948
Plaintiff: RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant: MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and LAKEISHA A. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. Morton
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff: Carlos Ortiz Pagan
Defendant: Roxanne Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?