Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Fernandes et al v. Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ana Fernandes and Armando Pereira
Defendant:
Federal Heath Sign Company, LLC, TARGET CORPORATION and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Benitez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pereira Benitez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JACQUET v. OFFICER LEE et al
as 5:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
DUDLEY JACQUET
Defendant:
OFFICER LEE, OFFICER PEREIRA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARENAS v. MALLORCA RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01510
Defendant:
MALLORCA RESTAURANT, INC. and ANTONIO PEREIRA
Plaintiff:
MAX M. ARENAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pereira et al v. Architectural Polymers, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
David Pereira and Rodney S. Steward
Defendant:
Architectural Polymers, Inc. and AP Thermoforming LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
LONGACRE v. K OCEAN TRANSPORT LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONGACRE
Defendant:
K OCEAN TRANSPORT LLC and JAILTON PEREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPES PEREIRA v. DE ANDRADE
as 2:2017cv05554
Petitioner:
POLIANE LOPES PEREIRA
Respondent:
JORCELI PEDRO DE ANDRADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
