Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RIVERSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. v. QUAD PLUS, LLC
as 1:2021cv01057
Plaintiff:
RIVERSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. and QUAD PLUS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERSIDE ENGINEERING, INC. v. QUAD PLUS, LLC
as 1:2021cv01063
Plaintiff:
RIVERSIDE ENGINEERING, INC.
Defendant:
QUAD PLUS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILPOT v. DOT COM PLUS, LLC
as 1:2014cv01980
Defendant:
DOT COM PLUS LLC
Plaintiff:
LARRY G. PHILPOT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BRAKE PLUS LLC et al v. KINETECH. LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01415
Third Party Defendant:
RICHARD BATTAGLINI, BRAKESAFE REAR END COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM, LLC., JEFF HAIL and others
Plaintiff:
BRAKE PLUS LLC, BRAKE PLUS NWA, INC., KEVIN CANNON and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
KINETECH. LLC
Defendant:
KINETECH. LLC and MARK OLSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
KINETECH, LLC v. BATTAGLINI et al
as 1:2013cv01196
Defendant:
RICHARD BATTAGLINI, BRAKE PLUS LLC, BRAKE PLUS NWA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KINETECH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
GOULDSBROUGH et al v. C-STORE PLUS LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
RHONDA J. BUNCH, DAVID E. COLLINS, JERRY E. CUFFLE and others
Defendant:
C-STORE PLUS, LLC and ZAID JABUR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KOPPOLD et al
as 1:2009cv00976
Plaintiff:
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
FRED KOPPOLD, CRAIG BELL and ALLIANCE AUTO PARTS PLUS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
