Cases 1 - 10 of 63
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SMALL et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
GARY SMALL, JESSICA RICHARDSON, CASSANDRA POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAGG v. TIERNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSEPH FLAGG
Defendant:
S. TIERNEY, RICHARDSON and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAGG v. VANVLEET et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSEPH FLAGG
Defendant:
R. VANVLEET, S. TIERNEY, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EATON et al v. ADKINS et al
as 2:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
ARSENIO EATON and DOMINIC POPE
Defendant:
ERIC ADKINS, STEPHANIE EDWARDSON, DANIKA MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC POPE
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, GONZALEZ and CHALOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
BRYCE POPE
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, BEDWELL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
CINDY POPE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
