Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kinard et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Brian Kinard, Laywood Molette, Jonathan Overfelt and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Divine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02104
Plaintiff:
Dominick Rufo, Nathaniel Rentz, David Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Quick et al v. United States of America et al
as 0:2018cv01709
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Quick and Michelle M. Quick
Defendant:
United States of America , State of Minnesota, Roundbank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv03034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Wyeth et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv03654
Plaintiff:
Gail Quick
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blast-Tek, Inc. v. Quick Tanks, Inc. et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 10cv3124. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED WITH 09cv365.
as 0:2010cv03124
Plaintiff:
Blast-Tek, Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Tanks, Inc. and McCoy Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quick v. King
as 0:2009cv01660
Petitioner:
Jon Earl Quick
Respondent:
John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Quick v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01358
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Quick, Michael Anthony Quick and Michael Anthony Quick
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Torts - Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
