Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ratcliff v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
James E. Ratcliff
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams et al v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply District
as 3:2020cv00469
Plaintiff:
John Quincy Adams and Alean Adams
Defendant:
Pearl River Valley Water Supply District, Ben Evans, Jack Winstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratcliff v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
James Edward Ratcliff
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Autman et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 5:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Grady Autman and Lora Autman
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , Holly Ratcliff and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ratcliff v. Geron Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
David M. Ratcliff
Defendant:
Geron Corporation, John A. Scarlett and Olivia K. Bloom
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mata v. Busher et al
as 4:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
Saul Mata
Defendant:
Jerry Busher, Unknown Ratcliff, Unknown Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Birdtail et al
as 3:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Bryant
Defendant:
J. Birdtail , S. Jones , Lakisha Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Birdtail et al
as 4:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Bryant
Defendant:
J. Birdtail, Jones Williams, Lakisha Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Earl Lee Wright
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Krusheta Hadley, Shelley F. Tew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
