Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanabria De Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-1148
Petitioner:
MIRNA SANABRIA DE HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sanabria v. Garland
as 22-9502
Petitioner:
JUANA SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Walter Juarez Sanabria v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2602
Petitioner:
WALTER GEOVANNY JUAREZ SANABRIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvarado-Sanabria v. Garland
as 21-172
Petitioner:
JESUS ALVARADO-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baez, et al v. Town of Brookline, et al
as 21-1278
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNARD E. GREENE, in his individual and official capacities, NANCY DALY, in her individual and official capacities, NEIL WISHINSKY, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUANA BAEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOSE ALBERTO NUNEZ-GUERRERO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEMETRIUS OVIEDO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
S. G., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A. D. G., DYANNA SANABRIA, N. B., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Araceli Boyce and others
Defendant:
3568 MOTOR LLC, HIRO KOBAYASHI and DOES, 1 through 10
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, PAUL KORETZ and VINCENT BERTONI
Maria Diaz Sanabria, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73624
Petitioner:
ALEXIA NICOL MELGAR-DIAZ and MARIA DEL CARMEN DIAZ SANABRIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
