Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wilson v. Dawson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson
Defendant:
G. Steven Dawson, Caterina A. Mozingo, Emily W. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Lanskey v. Medical Properties Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lanskey
Defendant:
Medical Properties Trust, Inc., Edward K. Aldag, Jr., J. Kevin Hanna and others
Sparks v. BlackDiamond Restaurant LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Eboni Desiree Sparks
Defendant:
BlackDiamond Restaurant LLC and Emmanuel Mbah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Spark Therapeutics, Inc. v. Tavakkoli
as 1:2020cv03504
Plaintiff:
Spark Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant:
Fatemeh Tavakkoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. AFL-CIO Employees Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2020cv01176
Defendant:
AFL-CIO Employees Federal Credit Union, Sparks Personnel Services, Inc. and Sparks Personnel Services, Inc. doing business as Sparks Group
Plaintiff:
Cole Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. Hunt Valley Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00726
Plaintiff:
Quinn Porter
Defendant:
Tom Sparks, Hunt Valley Contractors, Inc. and T.J. Spampinato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porter v. Hunt Valley Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00719
Defendant:
Tom Sparks, Hunt Valley Contractors, Inc. and T.J. Spampinato
Plaintiff:
Quinn Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tapling et al v. Marriott International Inc.
as 8:2018cv03703
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Tapling and David Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Sparks et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2018cv02926
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lydia Sparks and Carl Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
