Cases 1 - 10 of 2,695
STEVENS v. THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, MAURICE FINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06284
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FAGAN v. BARNHISER et al
as 2:2024cv06012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. FAGAN
Defendant:
BRET T. BARNHISER, NANOLOGIX, INC., DR. JONATHAN FARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
LANDOLFI v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05908
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LANDOLFI
Defendant:
RENE JONES and M&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PRIMORIS T&D SERVICES, LLC v. FIRSTENERGY CORP.
as 2:2024cv05877
Plaintiff:
PRIMORIS T&D SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
GOODWIN v. T-MOBILE U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05655
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GOODWIN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE U.S. INC., T-MOBILE LLC, PATRICIA CAULDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITROS v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2024cv04996
Defendant:
JENNIFER H. MCCONNELL, KEVIN T. MCCONNELL, HOLLY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
