Cases 91 - 100 of 125
Taylor v. CMF Vacaville, et al
as 2:2008cv01246
Plaintiff:
Joel Manuel Taylor
Defendant:
CMF Vacaville, Uppal, - Pat and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberto Socorro v. State of California, et al
as 08-16130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO SOCORRO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D. K. SISTO, Warden, A. W. SINGH and others
Oliver Williams v. State of California, et al
as 08-16102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM CAREY and others
Robert Johnson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 08-16014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT M JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK HICKMAN, ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, TOM L. CAREY and others
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008at00228
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire, Estate, Gerard Charles St. Jovite and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008cv00455
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woolf v. Sisto, et al
as 08-15260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERRY WOOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, A. W. SINGH, RODRIGUEZ and others
Cole v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Cole
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, Alvaro, C Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fryman v. Traquina et al
as 2:2007cv02636
Plaintiff:
Steven Fryman
Defendant:
A. Traquina and A. Noriega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. Naku et al
as 2:2007cv02203
Plaintiff:
Abel Cano
Defendant:
B. Naku and Alvaro C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
