Cases 11 - 20 of 516
Allen v. US
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE E. ALLEN, JOSEPH E. ARMSTEAD, LAWRENCE C. BECKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Anderson v. US
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY M. ANDERSON, PAUL L. BAILEY, RONALD L. BLASH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Beavis v. US
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rogers v. HHS
as 23-2176
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNADETTE ROGERS, as legal representative for Willie Lee Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Alonso v. Quan
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUAN, POLI FLORES, (NFN) ROSS and others
Boyd v. US
as 23-2104
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOYD, JR. and KARA BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESTER BONNER and PRINCESS WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Bowser v. Department of the Army, Fort A.P. Hill
as 23-2004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BOWSER
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT A.P. HILL
GurveyIn re: Gurvey
as 23-134
Petitioner:
In re: AMY REBECCA GURVEY
Respondent:
COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LIVE NATION, INC. and others
Greene v. US
as 23-1954
Plaintiff:
TONY LAMONTE GREENE, ANTHONY MICHAEL JACKSON, WILLIAM GEORGE COODEY, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE WAYNE BYRD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
