Cases 1 - 10 of 2,024
Zelesnik v. Massie et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Congressman Thomas Massie, Mayor Aftab Pureval, Tom T. Wallace and others
Daugherty v. KY State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
William J. Daugherty
Defendant:
KY State Penitentiary and Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hailey v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William T. Hailey
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center, Chief Trimmer and Capt. Timothy Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Roland v. Booth et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Susan Roland
Defendant:
Savannah J Booth, Allison Brinkhaus and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Lancaster v. Big G Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lancaster
Defendant:
Big G Express, Inc. doing business as RTR Transportation Services and Aerias Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Williams et al v. Openly LLC
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams and Emily Williams
Defendant:
Openly LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant:
Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
