Cases 1 - 10 of 3,593
Brown v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeff Macomber, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Nible v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
William Lyle Nible
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Tommee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Soto v. Sacramento Main Jail et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
William Soto
Defendant:
Sacramento Main Jail and Sacramento RCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 2:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024at00522
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
