Cases 21 - 30 of 16,698
v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02395
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02396
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Jeanne K. Williams v. ABC School District
as 2:2024cv03311
Plaintiff:
Jeanne K. Williams
Defendant:
ABC School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Devlin et al v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Michael Devlin and MD Group, LLC
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erik Jackson Williams v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Erik Jackson Williams
Defendant:
Riverside County, Riverside County Sheriff Department, Coello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
