Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyros v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dr. William M. Kyros, MD and Dr. William M. Kyros, M.D.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, James A Diossa, Rhode Island Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marin v. Billings et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Maryann Marin
Defendant:
Jack Billings, Merrie Scott, Newport County Community Mental Health Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Etukudor Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, Google Inc., PACER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cote v. Travis et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Cote
Defendant:
Donna Travis, William Foley, Vincent Gebhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vose v. Suttell et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Carlton Vose
Defendant:
Paul A Suttell, Maureen M. Goldberg, William P. Robinson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasquez v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00448
Defendant:
Diego Velasquez and William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
