Cases 1 - 10 of 109
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jameka Lashell Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Teneisha Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Sipple Bey et al v. Meyer et al
as 5:2024cv04015
Plaintiff:
Gary Sipple Bey and Annette Sipple
Defendant:
William Meyer, Brian Hill, G. Jeffrey Records, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Quesenberry v. William Moses Co. Inc.
as 1:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Bryan Quesenberry
Defendant:
William Moses Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Kay-Xiong Yang v. Scott Halloin, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
KAY-XIONG YANG
Defendant:
SCOTT R. HALLOIN, SHEILA L. SHADMAN EMERSON, MOLLY S. FITZGERALD and others
Burney v. Madison Parish Hospital Service District et al
as 3:2023cv01779
Plaintiff:
Stevie Burney
Defendant:
Madison Parish Hospital Service District, Dr. Donald Perry, Felicia Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
William Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, P.C., et al
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAVAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and COLLENE K. CORCORAN
Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, PC et al
as 5:2023cv12183
Plaintiff:
William A. Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Lavan and Associates, PC and Collene K Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
