Cases 21 - 30 of 3,570
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Collins, Williams, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Williams, White, Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Chavis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Eric Young, Leslie Powell and Wyant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Moore, Hirst, Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Business Integration Partners USA Inc.
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
William G. Morgan
Defendant:
Business Integration Partners USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Murray v. United States Department of Justice
as 7:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
