Cases 11 - 20 of 2,136
Yates v. HDSP
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Roderico LeCount Yates
Defendant:
HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al v. Brian Yates
as 8:2023mc00016
Petitioner:
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY and ARUBA NETWORKS LLC
Respondent:
Brian Yates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Deanna Yates v. The Money Source, Inc., et al
as 23-16005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANNA KATHLEEN YATES
Defendant / Appellee:
THE MONEY SOURCE, INC., DBA Endeavor America Loan Services, MIDLAND MORTGAGE, TRUSTEE, REMIC PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES FANNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2017-21 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
