Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Yates v. SSA
as 7:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ryan Yates
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yates v. Gates Rubber Company
as 3:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Virgil H. Yates
Defendant:
Gates Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yates v. Unknown Defendant
as 0:2015cv00099
Petitioner:
Tyrone Yates
Respondent:
Jodie L. Snyder-Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cochran et al v. Jefferson County Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 3:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jeannean Cochran , Paula Barr , Cherri Beckhart and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Public Schools Board of Education , Donna M. Hargens , American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Indiana-Kentucky Organizing Committee 962 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yates et al v. Davis et al
as 0:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Yates and Will Smith
Defendant:
Kim Davis and Rowan County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherley v. Thompson et al
as 4:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sherley
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Alan Brown, Robert Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Risner et al
as 5:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Harold Delontay Jackson
Defendant:
Risner, Jenkins, Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Beyer et al
as 5:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Julia L. Yates
Defendant:
James R. Beyer , Jon Hayden , McCracken County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Asia Adams , Lisa Amador , Kochshina Borden and others
Defendant:
Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC and Nathan Bunger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
