Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WALLERSTEIN v. YATES et al
as 1:2023cv03739
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY WALLERSTEIN and MELVIN YATES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SIBLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Plaintiff:
LOWELL SIBLEY, SUZI FERNANDEZ, JORDAN SIBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
DOE v. DUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOLOF THE ARTS PROJECT et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOLOF THE ARTS PROJECT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
YATES v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01449
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DARVIN YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSSMANN v. IVANOV et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
SERGEY IVANOV, LES VERMILLION, SONDRA YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and SALLY QUILLIAN YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JUSTE v. RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
RESIDENT AGENCY MARTINSBURG, MARTINEZ , JUDY PRESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
