Cases 1 - 10 of 1,725
JONES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09294
Petitioner:
JAMES EMORY JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CANGE v. TUTU et al
as 3:2024cv09118
Defendant:
AKWASI OSEI, SANDRA DELAUDER, RENEE JONES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv09033
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KENVUE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
JONES v. NORBULK SHIPPING UK et al
as 1:2024cv08719
Defendant:
John DOES 1-3, NORBULK SHIPPING UK and JOHN DOES 4-6
Plaintiff:
KURT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jones et al v. Kenvue, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv08571
Defendant:
KENVUE INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
Ashly Jones and Basim Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv08389
Defendant:
ALLERGAN USA, INC. and LIFECELL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J.G. v. JONES
as 1:2024cv08232
Defendant:
TYLER JONES and TYLER JOHN JONES
Plaintiff:
J. G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOLMES et al v. RE MENTOR et al
as 1:2024cv08003
Plaintiff:
KAYLAN JONES and DAMON HOLMES
Defendant:
TAMMY BECKWITH, DAVID LINDHAL and RE MENTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
