Cases 1 - 10 of 1,645
Williams v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 2:2024cv11555
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson #253538 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dennis Grayson #253538
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Sternfeld et al v. Oak Park, City of
as 2:2024cv10846
Plaintiff:
Howard Sternfeld, Joyce Sternfeld, Howard T. Sternfeld and others
Defendant:
City of Oak Park and Oak Park, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Strong #834816 v. Sandborn et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant:
Unknown Sandborn, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hayes, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Herbert May
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
