Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Porter v. Crook et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Katie Crook, Daniel Martinez, Gabe Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yuwsuf Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Incorporated, et al
as 23-2813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUWSUF A. GHAFOOR, ELIZABETH A. ACEVEDO, RICHIE L. ACEVEDO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation licensed to conduct business in Illinois and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Mateo v. First Portfolio Ventures I, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv08896
Plaintiff:
Dulce Acevedo Mateo
Defendant:
First Portfolio Ventures I, LLC and ATG Credit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Acevedo Jr. v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY et al
as 3:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo Jr.
Defendant:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION A/K/A PROGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Acevedo et al v. Mattioli et al
as 2:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo and Estate of Joel Acevedo
Defendant:
Michael A Mattioli, Robert Roach and Alfonso Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Mark D. Wolfe and Lexi Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D Smith, Kamitha Madkins and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Menez
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Gremlin Menez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
