Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ACEVEDO v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ACEVEDO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, ISAIAH INGRAM, BREIT NE ROOSEVELT OWNER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Candelario v. Martinez et al
as 5:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jose Candelario
Defendant:
Pedro Martinez and David Berrios-Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Acevedo v. Walter
as 3:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
A.M. Walter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Acevedo v. USA
as 1:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
Matthew Jeremy Acevedo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Acevedo v. Brittain et al
as 3:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, A.M. Walter and N.J. Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
ACEVEDO v. C&D SECURITY MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
JESENIA ACEVEDO
Defendant:
C&D SECURITY MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
