Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Acevedo v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Acevedo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Anny Acevedo
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acevedo et al v. C&H Precision Weapons, LLC. et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sheyla Acevedo, Laura Bragg and Jamiee Harrison
Defendant:
C&H Precision Weapons, LLC., Dot Ops Inc., Michael B. Holly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Acevedo v. Troup County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Jason Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joubert et al v. Hussain et al
as 1:2018cv00147
Defendant:
Victory Duncan, Lisa Childs, Zachary Hussain and others
Plaintiff:
Demetris Stokes, Olga Maria Acevedo, Katherine Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Acevedo v. Elite Lawns, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03012
Plaintiff:
David Acevedo
Defendant:
Elite Lawns, Inc. and Darrell McMillin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2016cv04519
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Eric Henry, S. Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
