Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tron-Haukebo v. Clallam County et al
as 3:2024cv05051
Plaintiff:
Anders Tron-Haukebo
Defendant:
Clallam County, Amy Oakes, Clallam County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tron-Haukebo v. Clallam County et al
as 3:2023cv05521
Plaintiff:
Anders Tron-Haukebo and Mark Anders Tronsen
Defendant:
Clallam County, State of Washington, Robert Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tron-Haukebo v. Clallam County et al
as 3:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Anders Tron-Haukebo and Mark Anders Tronsen
Defendant:
Clallam County, Brian King, Mark Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01697
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tron-Haukebo et al v. Nichols et al
as 3:2018cv05652
Defendant:
Keith W Brady, The City of Sequim Police Department, Mark Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Anders Tron-Haukebo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Guthrie
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Officer Sigh and Stuart Anders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Snohomish County
as 2:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Guthrie
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Stewart Anders, Sigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
