Cases 1 - 10 of 76
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vinyard v. Konrad et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Joshuwa R. Vinyard
Defendant:
Konrad, Arana, Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Arana v. Land O' Lakes, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Sandra Becerra Arana
Defendant:
Land O' Lakes, Inc. and Kozy Shack Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp v. Jeff Lynch et al.
as 2:2023cv08317
Petitioner:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sharp v. Lynch et al.
as 3:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. El Bey Sharp
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Altom, Axelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Berumen v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Daniel Berumen
Defendant:
T. Jones, L. Carrasco, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalpesh Solanki v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Defendant:
Officer Arana, Officer Bonilla, Officer T. Cho and others
Plaintiff:
Kalpesh Solanki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
