Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Solano v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2020cv01378
Defendant:
Correction Officer A. Aubin, Correction Officer Taft, The Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Solano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Aubin et al
as 1:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Anthony Aubin and Justin Daniels
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Aubin v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2019cv04985
Defendant:
Suffolk County Police Department, John Doe, Suffolk County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Aubin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anselmo v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 9:2019cv00350
Defendant:
Keysor, Gregory Cassidy, John McIntyre and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Anselmo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aubin v. Robert James and Associates Asset Management, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01160
Plaintiff:
Darcey Aubin
Defendant:
Robert James and Associates Asset Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodriguez et al v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2011cv06256
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rodriguez , Braulio Lopez , Joselito Perez and others
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Karen St Aubin and Paul Holohan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Phelan v. Durniak et al
as 9:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
M. Durniak, Wise, H. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillard v. Rovelli et al
as 9:2009cv00860
Plaintiff:
Gary Gillard
Defendant:
Michael Rovelli, Frank Flores, S. Shattuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillard v. Rovelli et al
as 9:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
Gary Gillard
Defendant:
Michael Rovelli, Scott Hamel, Alfred Aubin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
