Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Avalos v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo et al
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Pablo Avalos
Defendant:
The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, The City of Albuquerque, Jason Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos v. USA
as 2:2022cv00915
Petitioner:
Ernesto Avalos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Avalos v. Gloria et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Raul Avalos
Defendant:
R Gloria, FNU Trujillo and FNU Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00624
Plaintiff:
Amanda Avalos
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Avalos v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00869
Plaintiff:
Pete Avalos
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Avalos v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00777
Plaintiff:
Naomi S. Avalos
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diaz v. Las Cruces Public Schools et al
as 2:2014cv00497
Defendant:
Las Cruces Public Schools and Xavier Avalos
Plaintiff:
Susana Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avalos v. McKinley County Detention Center
as 1:2013cv01200
Defendant:
McKinley County Detention Center , FNU Johnson and FNU Ritchard
Plaintiff:
Felipe Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
Pete Avalos
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Par Mineral Corporation v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co., L.P, L.L.L.P.
as 6:2007cv01193
Plaintiff:
Par Mineral Corporation
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Co., L.P., L.L.L.P., Kenneth Allen, Johnny Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
