Cases 41 - 50 of 32,568
Alvarez Esquivel v. Garland
as 24-2950
Petitioner:
HESER OMAR ALVAREZ ESQUIVEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Argueta Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2953
Petitioner:
SARA ESTER ARGUETA RAMOS, PAOLA SARAI RAMIREZ ARGUETA and BRENDA LIZETH HILARIO ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez Aguilar v. Garland
as 24-2957
Petitioner:
JUAN GOMEZ AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Patmos Hosting, Inc v. Truth Army Productions, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03860
Plaintiff:
Patmos Hosting, Inc
Defendant:
Truth Army Productions, LLC, Geoffrey B Sando and Joseph Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media v. Castellanos Fierro
as 5:2024cv02756
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Karen Julieth Castellanos Fierro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
