Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2023cv05240
Plaintiff:
Meghan B. Thomas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Dixon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Dixon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gurung v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
Nar B. Gurung
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watts v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Kelly B Watts
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Elliott v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Elliott
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Solis v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Consuelo B. Solis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keys v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Adrian B. Keys
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Holmes v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2022cv02094
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Holmes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2022cv05067
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Edens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
