Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Otero v. Haftopulos et al
as 4:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Chantel Otero
Defendant:
Christopher Allen Haftopulos and B R Williams Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Silo Technologies, Inc. v. B&R Express LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Silo Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
B&R Express LLC and Danny Baquero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Garcia, Jr. v. B R Williams Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
B R Williams Trucking, Inc. and Gary Kent Gable
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 7:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Bernal Rincon
as 5:2020cv00083
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramiro Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
dba Transportes J B R
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00610
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Servicios Misiones S.A. de C.V. v. B R Crane & Equipment, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv03347
Plaintiff:
Servicios Misiones S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
B R Crane & Equipment, LLC and Rahim Bahadurali Rajwani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lawson v. Sopchak et al
as 4:2017mc02801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lawson, Sr
Defendant:
Larry Sopchak, B R Williams and Doe 1 Thru 100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
