Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BENNETT v. FRANKSTOWN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
CHRIS BENNETT, JR.
Defendant:
FRANKSTOWN TOWNSHIP, GEORGE HENRY, KENNETH WERTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Bennett v. CAM Superline, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Bennett
Defendant:
CAM Superline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
BENNETT v. SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
TODD BENNETT
Defendant:
SILVER CREEK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BENNETT v. TELERENT LEASING CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv06382
Plaintiff:
MARY KAY BENNETT
Defendant:
TELERENT LEASING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bennett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Randy Bennett
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BENNETT v. CROSSMARK, INC.
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BENNETT
Defendant:
CROSSMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BENNETT v. PHILADLEPHIA UC SERVICE CENTER
as 2:2010cv04665
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BENNETT
Defendant:
PHILADLEPHIA UC SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BENNETT v. VISION AUTO, INC. et al
as 5:2009cv01954
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BENNETT
Defendant:
VISION AUTO, INC. and AMERIFLEX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1161 COBRA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
