Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pinski
Defendant:
City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilhite v. Expensify, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Cody Wilhite
Defendant:
Expensify, Inc., David Barrett, Ryan Schaffer and others
Billingsley v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01445
Petitioner:
Sean Blake Billingsley
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robles v. OSH Junction City et al
as 6:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
OSH Junction City, Forest Ty Team and Blake Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strock et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Jacob Strock, Tarjen Jokon, James Libokmeto and others
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Jamie Miller, Mike Real and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reyes v. US Govt FCC
as 3:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Blake Reyes
Defendant:
US Govt FCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
