Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Batista-Mora et al v. Sancho et al
as 2:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Juan Batista-Mora, Manuel Batista-Alaba and Santa Dolores Blanco-Hernandez
Defendant:
Fernando Sancho and Excel Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Blanco v. State of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Michell Blanco, Mitchell Blanco and Michel Blanco
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
National Produce Trading Company, LLC v. Henderson Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02035
Plaintiff:
National Produce Trading Company, LLC
Defendant:
Henderson Foods, Inc. t/a Tierra Produce, Gilberto Blanco, Salvador Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Blanco v. US Department of State
as 2:2021cv01523
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Blanco
Defendant:
US Department of State
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00518
Defendant:
NNCC Prison, Mr. Hannah, Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Interested Party:
Hernan Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanco v. Jacoby et al
as 3:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michell Blanco
Defendant:
Jacoby and Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Gittere et al
as 2:2019cv02166
Defendant:
William Reubart, Blanco, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv00971
Defendant:
William Kuloloia, J. Beck, Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Argote-Estrada et al v. Greenway Trans, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Argote-Estrada and Irosbel Reyes-Blanco
Defendant:
Greenway Trans, Inc. and Veaceslav Repin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
