Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thompson v. Pierce Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stacy Thompson
Defendant:
Pierce Automotive, Inc. doing business as Toyota of Hattiesburg, Jake Bolton, Alton Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Breland v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Clint Breland
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi , John Traxler , Frazier Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Willis et al v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Sandra Willis , David Knight , Charmaine Willis and others
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg , Frazier Bolton , Scott Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolton v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2011cv00421
Plaintiff:
Tawana Bolton
Defendant:
Forrest County, Mississippi, Chris Selman and Charles Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
Tawana Bolton
Defendant:
Forrest County, Mississippi , Chris Selman and Charles Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
