Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. Bolton et al
as 1:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Defendant:
Timothy A. Bolton and Richard L Schulte, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
State of Ohio ex rel et al v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Mentor City Council, City of Mentor and Mentor Municipal Planning Commission
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Charles P. Bolton, William P. Bolton, and Bolton Properties, Ltd., Bolton Properties, Ltd., Charles P. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. Davol et al
as 2:2020cv02565
Defendant:
Inc. Davol, C. R. Bard, Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GLYNIS ELAINE BOLTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolton v. The Almar Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ann Bolton
Defendant:
The Almar Smith Corporation and Mary Jo Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bolton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01122
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Bolton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Filing Error
as 1:2018cv46138
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bolton and Angel Bolton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
