Cases 1 - 10 of 883
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
April Paw
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nash v. F C I - Talladega
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant:
Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguayo v. Peters et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Bertha Aguayo
Defendant:
C Peters and Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olaiya v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Temitope Olaiya
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peck v. Gordo Police Department et al
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peck
Defendant:
Gordo Police Department, Marcia Parham, Doug Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Sonia Hernandez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
