Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Maise v. Political Action Committees-Class I et al
as 1:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Philip B. Maise
Defendant:
Political Action Committees-Class I, Individual Defendants-Class IIa, Class II-b, Class II-c, Non-Individual Defendants-Class II-d and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Chung Kuo Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Hubtech International Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Chung Kuo Insurance Company, Ltd.
Defendant:
Hubtech International Corporation, Young C. Kim and Un Chung Yoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Guam et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Arnold Davis
Defendant:
Guam , Guam Election Commission, Alice M. Taijeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Brien v. Gayle et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dustin O'Brien
Defendant:
Ana Maria C. Gayle and Public Defender Service Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bryan v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
F.B.I., S.L.E.D., U.S. Attorney (S.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
F.B.I., S.L.E.D., U.S. Attorney (S.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taitano v. Salas et al
as 1:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Arthur T. Taitano
Defendant:
Jose Q. Salas, Soledad Chargualaf, Kenneth C. Boardman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chou et al v. Baza et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joe Hsio-Chun Chou and Alice C. Chou
Defendant:
Antonio Herrero Baza and Frank Leon Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teleguam Holdings, LLC v. Guam Public Utilities Commission et al
as 1:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Teleguam Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Guam Public Utilities Commission and Jeffrey C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pae v. USA
as 1:2007cv00028
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Soon C. Pae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
