Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13204
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maynard v. Bel Real Estate Advisors, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv13084
Plaintiff: Dennis C. Maynard
Defendant: Bel Real Estate Advisors, LLC Doing business as Greystone Bel REal Estate Advisors, Cary Belovicz, AAA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Webster v. Autozone Development, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13033
Plaintiff: Dwayne E. Webster
Defendant: Autozone Development, LLC, Autzone Stores, LLC, AutoZone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knopek v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2023cv13028
Plaintiff: Kirk Knopek
Defendant: City of Warren, C Wells, R McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Curtis v. Curtis et al
as 2:2023cv12857
Plaintiff: Sharon Curtis
Defendant: Janette Curtis, Ocwen Loan Servicing, L. L. C., PHH Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Beasley v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2023cv12802
Plaintiff: Daniel C. Beasley
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martin v. Sass et al
as 2:2023cv12741
Plaintiff: Eric Martin
Defendant: Ryan Sass, Robert Herrst, Mike LNU and others
Dixon v. 36th District Court et al
as 2:2023cv12709
Plaintiff: Samuel Maurice Dixon, II
Defendant: 36th District Court and Lydia Nance C. Adams
Williams et al v. Gold et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv12690
Plaintiff: Edward S. Williams and Camile V. Williams
Defendant: Stuart A. Gold, Elias T. Majoros, Jason P. Smalarz and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?