Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Conner v. United States
as 2:2015cv02598
Petitioner: Kenneth Conner
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conner v. United States
as 2:2015cv02597
Petitioner: Kenneth Conner
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conner v. USA
as 3:2015cv00366
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Stephen Michael Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard v. Donahue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01076
Plaintiff: Christopher Howard
Defendant: Michael Donahue, Mitch Bradshaw, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Williamson County Jail
as 3:2013cv00868
Plaintiff: Ollie Jason Durham and James D. Conner, Jr.
Defendant: Williamson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner, et al. v. Williamson County Jail, et al
as 3:2013cv00848
Plaintiff: James David Conner and Ollie Jason Durham
Defendant: Williamson County Jail and Williamson County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Shelby County, TN. et al
as 2:2012cv02199
Petitioner: Cher Tretesse Conner
Respondent: Shelby County, TN. and Desoto County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll v. Hardeman County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01185
Plaintiff: Jerry Carroll
Defendant: Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Corrections Corperation of America, Christian Chrismaru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01068
Plaintiff: Kenny Ray Morris
Defendant: Joe Easterling and Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conners v. Hamblen County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00055
Plaintiff: Phillip J Conners
Defendant: Hamblen County Jail and Hamblen County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?