Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McCabe v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
James I. McCabe
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Corrections Health Care Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Bibbs v. Edward Klem, et al
as 11-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD KLEM, Superintendent, JOHN KERESTES, MARVA CERULLO and others
Ajlane v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
Zakaria Ajlane
Defendant:
John Kerestes , John Muick , Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Cerullo et al
as 3:2010cv01899
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Sutton
Defendant:
Marva Cerullo, Alice Chipriano, Nelson Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeithan v. Iannuzzi et al
as 1:2010cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dennis McKeithan
Defendant:
Nelson Iannuzzi, NP , John Lisiak, M.D. , Marva Cerullo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purcell Bronson, et al v. John W. Kerestes, et al
as 10-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
BRENDA LYNN TRITT, THOMAS DERFLER, SHARON LUQUIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D. AMBRISTER and JOHN W. KERESTES
Debtor - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
O'BRIEN
Foster v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv01696
Plaintiff:
W.E. Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, John Kerestes, S. Luqnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bronson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Purcell Bronson
Defendant:
John W. Kerestes, Brenda L. Tritt, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bibbs v. Kelm et al
as 3:2008cv02279
Plaintiff:
Michael Bibbs
Defendant:
Edward J. Kelm, John Kerestes, Marva Cerullo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRESSLEY v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv04917
Plaintiff:
SEAN PRESSLEY
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CURULLO, A. CHIPRIANO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
