Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ROSS v. POLKY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
KERRY ROSS
Defendant:
MORGAN POLKY, TRACY CLARK and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK v. ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J CLARK
Defendant:
ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD and ABIGAIL T MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ODEN v. CITY OF WESTBROOK et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
WESTBROOK POLICE DEPARTMENT, AUSTIN CLARK, JANINE L ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ODEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLLIS et al v. TOWN OF JAY et al
as 1:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
DARREN L POLLIS and CAROL DOLBIER
Defendant:
TOWN OF JAY , FRANKLIN COUNTY , MC DISPOSAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FILLER v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
VLADEK FILLER
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY , WILLIAM CLARK , WASHINGTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
EATON v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
RONALD EATON
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REGAN v. SAD NO 63 et al
as 1:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
LOUISE M REGAN
Defendant:
SAD NO 63 , DION SEYMOUR , KAREN CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MAINE et al v. SECRETARY OF STATE, ME
as 1:2008cv00288
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MAINE , BOB BARR , WAYNE A ROOT and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF STATE, ME
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
