Cases 21 - 30 of 358
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Clark v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Susan Clark
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Reynolds v. Clark et al
as 0:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Reynolds
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Clark and Metropolitan Airports Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stark et al v. Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C. et al
as 0:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak, Clark Anderson and others
Defendant:
Frida Drywall Systems L.L.C., Karla Arceo and Karla S. Arceo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stark et al v. Hennepin Drywall I LLC et al
as 0:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak, Clark Anderson and others
Defendant:
Hennepin Drywall I LLC, Rosalina Mendoza-Jimenez and Catherine S. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Clark v. Social Security Administration
as 0:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Shilitha Clark
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jefferson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Troy Jefferson, Jennifer Light, Robert Summers and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
