Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights-Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hull v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv10067
Plaintiff:
Austin Hull
Defendant:
Spencer Coleman, Ken Miller and William Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2022cv10306
Plaintiff:
Ricky Scott
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, WA Foot Memorial Hospital, Azam Basheer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS V THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
as 2:2022cv10296
Defendant:
SHAMILYA WILLIAMS, University of Michigan, University of Michigan Work Connections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ann Coffey
Defendant:
Freeport, City of, Bay View, City of, Munson Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
