Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Conners
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles , Charles Tipton and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glass et al v. O'Conner et al
as 5:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tywana Glass , Sarah Smith , Deondre Burress and others
Defendant:
Daniel O'Conner, III, Douglas Weaver, Sr. and Salty Gator Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Conner v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00983
Plaintiff:
Charles Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Conner
as 2:2016mc01869
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Lugenia L Conner
Conner v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2016cv01830
Plaintiff:
Corlithia Rashae Conner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Conner v. Sammy's Gentlemen's Club et al
as 2:2016cv01650
Plaintiff:
Timothy Conner
Defendant:
Sammy's Gentlemen's Club and Mario Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conner v. Stewart
as 1:2016cv00273
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Conner
Respondent:
Cynthia D. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Speight v. Monroe County Jail, et al
as 1:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Speight
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Captain F. Conner and Administrator of the Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Conners
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
