Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robinson v. Weisenberg et al
as 1:2021cv10397
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Merrill and McGeary, Attorneys At Law, Robert Weisenberg and Suffolk County Constable's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ExteNet Systems, Inc. v. Town of Hull, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2020cv10394
Defendant:
John D. Reilly, Jennifer Berardi-Constable, Town of Hull, Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff:
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ragnar v. Silver et al
as 1:2009cv10147
Plaintiff:
Inar Ragnar
Defendant:
Elizabeth Silver, The Department of Transitional Assistance, The New England Housing Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crawford v. Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10048
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Crawford
Defendant:
Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., Wolverine, Protor & Schwartz, Ltd., Phoenix UK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Constable
as 1:2007mc10298
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Constable
Iagatta v. Iagatta, et al
as 1:2007cv10433
Petitioner:
Daniel Iagatta, III
Respondent:
Michelle A. Iagatta, Triple M Moving and Storage, Inc., Jerold Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
