Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Emma Jean Anderson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Petitioner:
Emma Jean Anderson, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Respondent:
Islamic Republic of Iran and National Iranian Oil Corporation
Interested Party:
Oaktree Capital Management, LP and Oaktree Capital Management LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Xaime Casillas v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv09606
Plaintiff:
Xaime Casillas
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Officer Robert Cosner, DOES and others
Tyrone Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05641
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Acosta, Miguel Aguayo, Robert Aguilar and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Petitioner:
Christopher Patterson
Timothy M. Cosner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv02092
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Cosner
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Brad Pearson v. Annette Scherrer-Cosner et al
as 8:2014cv00089
Defendant:
DOES, Savi Professional Services, Inc, Annette Scherrer-Cosner and others
Cross Defendant:
Brad Pearson
Plaintiff:
Brad Pearson
Cross Claimant:
Savi Professional Services, Inc and Silver Oak Real Estate of Orange County Inc
Cosner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2013cv05959
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Cosner
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Hencel et al v. Allied Container Systems Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01557
Defendant:
Allied Container Systems Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Scott Cosner, Robert Neil Hencel and Dennis Meyers
Myrick v. Ives et al
as 2:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Myrick
Defendant:
Ives, Willliams, Cosner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
