Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Crenshaw v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Carleen Crenshaw
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Penzone
as 2:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Carleen Crenshaw and Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kathy Diana Crenshaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crenshaw v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv04361
Plaintiff:
Byron Nelson Crenshaw
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaffer v. Tri State Motor Transit et al
as 2:2018cv03212
Defendant:
Tri State Motor Transit, Stephen Crenshaw and Michael Fisk
Plaintiff:
James Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04337
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01556
Petitioner:
Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conway et al v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv01349
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Conway , Corey Musselman , San Antonio Orthopaedic Group LLP and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Incorporated, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Crenshaw-Bruce v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2013cv01606
Petitioner:
Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crenshaw-Bruce v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2013cv01235
Plaintiff:
Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
