Cases 11 - 20 of 86
LAZAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAZAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCDERMOTT, DAVID BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CRUZ v. PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
as 2:2023cv04626
Plaintiff:
MARIO CRUZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SERRANO v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al
as 5:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CRUZ SERRANO
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, LA FORTALEZA, ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. LENIHAN
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE LISA PUPO LENIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. MCCORMICK
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
